England Domestic Season, 1824
Gentlemen v Players
Lord's, London
2,3,4 August 1824 (3-day match)
Result: Players won by 103 runs
Toss:
Umpires:
Balls per over: 4
Players per side: Gentlemen 14; Players 11
Close of play:
Day 1:
Players 1st innings
G Brown st Keen 7
T Beagley c Nicholas 10
J Jordan c WE Otway 1
J Saunders c Budd 0
J Bowyer c Ward 3
W Hooker b Nicholas 12
W Searle c Barnett 24
J Broadbridge c Budd 26
W Slater c Keen 4
W Mathews not out 0
W Ashby run out 10
Extras 0
Total (all out, ? overs) 97
FoW: 1-?, 2-?, 3-?, 4-?, 5-?, 6-?, 7-?, 8-?, 9-?, 10-97.
Bowling O M R W
Nicholas ? ? ? 1
Gentlemen 1st innings
W Keen b Ashby 1
J Brand b Ashby 0
W Ward b Ashby 0
EH Budd b Mathews 42
WH Sewell b Ashby 1
Lord F Beauclerk c Saunders 14
WE Otway st Slater 0
T Nicoll st Slater 1
F Nicholas c Broadbridge 13
J Grinham st Slater 3
CJ Barnett st Slater 0
Roberts not out 4
JM Otway b Ashby 4
HJ Lloyd b Ashby 8
Extras (b 1) 1
Total (all out, ? overs) 92
FoW: 1-?, 2-?, 3-?, 4-?, 5-?, 6-?, 7-?, 8-?, 9-?, 10-?, 11-?,
12-?, 13-92.
Bowling O M R W
Ashby ? ? ? 6
Mathews ? ? ? 1
Players 2nd innings
G Brown c Beauclerk 42
T Beagley c Barnett 37
J Jordan c Barnett 3
J Saunders b Nicholas 26
J Bowyer b Roberts 24
W Hooker b Budd 12
W Searle b Beauclerk 30
J Broadbridge b Beauclerk 45
W Slater b Beauclerk 7
W Mathews b Nicholas 0
W Ashby not out 5
Extras (b 3) 3
Total (all out, ? overs) 234
FoW: 1-?, 2-?, 3-?, 4-?, 5-?, 6-?, 7-?, 8-?, 9-?, 10-234.
Bowling O M R W
Nicholas ? ? ? 2
Roberts ? ? ? 1
Budd ? ? ? 1
Beauclerk ? ? ? 3
Gentlemen 2nd innings (target: 240 runs)
W Keen b Mathews 9
J Brand b Broadbridge 11
W Ward c Mathews 20
WH Sewell c Brown 0
Lord F Beauclerk b Ashby 21
WE Otway c Brown 3
T Nicoll run out 0
F Nicholas b Broadbridge 51
J Grinham st Slater 0
CJ Barnett c Broadbridge 4
Roberts st Slater 14
JM Otway not out 2
HJ Lloyd b Ashby 3
EH Budd absent hurt -
Extras 0
Total (all out, ? overs) 138
FoW: 1-?, 2-?, 3-?, 4-?, 5-?, 6-?, 7-?, 8-?, 9-?, 10-?, 11-?,
12-138.
Bowling O M R W
Ashby ? ? ? 2
Mathews ? ? ? 1
Broadbridge ? ? ? 2
- It is not known which Otway took the catch - assumed to be WE.
|