|
|
Lucky Slater calls for candid camera to help umpires
AFP
4 January 1999
SYDNEY, Jan 4 (AFP) - Michael Slater admitted he was fortunate to
survive a close run-out call on the way to his blazing century in the
fifth Test against England on Monday.
The Australian opener played one of his greatest innings -- hitting
123 off 189 balls with 11 fours and three sixes -- as the home side
sought victory in the deciding Test.
At the close of the third day, England were 104 for two, still
requiring 183 runs for victory.
But England were angry over the life given to Slater on 35 when he was
startled by Dean Headley's throw from long on which scored a direct
hit at the bowler's end.
Repeated television replays on the giant video screen made it seem
Slater was short of his crease, but he was given the benefit of the
doubt by the third umpire Simon Taufel in the stands.
``I think the umpire from the camera angles he had he made the best
decision he could from what he saw and fortunately I knew it was
close. All direct hits are close, but I got the benefit of the doubt
because of the camera angles,'' said Slater.
Slater said he believed it was time for more cameras to be used to
stop similar controversies. ``Definitely, if you are going to have the
third umpire then get the cameras in place so it's conclusive,'' he
said.
``If there's a camera on the other side of the ground square-on there's
no doubt you would know one way or the other.
``The (third) umpire can only make a judgment on what he saw at the
time, he took his time, it was a good three or four minutes and he
came up with the decision he thought was the right one.''
Copyright 1998-2001 AFP. All rights reserved. All information displayed on
this page (dispatches, photographs, logos), with the exception of CricInfo
logos and trademarks, are protected by intellectual property rights owned
by Agence France Presse. As a consequence you may not copy, reproduce,
modify, transmit, publish, display or in any way commercially exploit any
of the contents of this section without prior written consent of
Agence-France-Presse.
|
|
|