Jimmy Adams injury mystery deepens
Trevor Chesterfield
23 January 1999
East London (South Africa) - If we are to believe the official
version, West Indies all-rounder Jimmy Adams sliced a tendon of
the small finger in his left hand with a weapon no more dangerous
than the serrated edge of a plastic knife provided in the first
class section of an aircraft on its way to South Africa.
It happened, so we were told, while he was slicing something as
simple as a crusty bread roll. All so innocent and above board
and the injured party was embarrassed by the ``fuss and bother the
wound'' created. As it is the pay dispute and its ensuing
aftermath with a tour match (at Randjesfontein) abandoned and the
skipper Brian Lara apologising to `` . . . the South African fans''
for delaying the tour, had left some journalists bemused and
skeptical. Something did not quite make two and two.
Against such a background and in the murky light surrounding the
start of the tour most forgot about the Adams injury; barely a
eyebrow twitched at the mention of a sliced tendon: nothing was
said when it was first reported he would be ready in time for the
Durban Test of the Castle Lager series. And just a couple of
paragraphs greeted management's announcement that the ``injury was
not healing as quickly as hoped and he is returning home . . .''
Episodes one and two all neatly swept under the carpet. No fuss
no bother.
Just as it was assumed he would return for the Standard Bank
Series of one-dayers after his promising form in the Caribbean
Busta Trophy (first-class) series among the replacements for
Courtney Walsh, Clayton Lambert, Stuart Williams and Mervyn
Dillon, he was left out. Okay, so the West Indies selectors
wanted to experiment for the games against Australia. And as
Adams capabilities are well documented, uncapped Keith Semple was
the obvious choice.
On the last day of the Newlands Test (the fourth in the series) a
whisper emerged from within the ranks of the West Indies about
why Adams would not be returning to South Africa: remembering, of
course, the replacement names had not been mentioned, although
Reon King was confirmed as one of them. It was, came the whisper
(initially surfacing in Pietermaritzburg in late December), that
Adams had a falling out with Lara, and it had nothing to do with
the pay dispute. In fact, it was said a third party was involved.
Very interesting . . . And so those early rumours were true:
there was a major split in the ranks, that Adams departure was
tied up with a far uglier side of the team's character.
Next to surface at Centurion was a casual comment on the day
before the final Test when the West Indies held a net session
before South Africa. Adams it was said ``had been the victim of
unhappy circumstances''. Hard evidence of what the ``circumstances''
were about emerged on the evening of day three during a private
party. A couple of Windies players, packed and ready for home,
mumbled over a glass of their sponsors products about how Adams
had been instrumental the season before in shaping A Team unity
during the South African tour. The incident on the aircraft gave
Lara the chance to get rid of a man whom he saw as a threat to
his leadership. If we are to get this unofficial version right,
there was a row between Lara and an unnamed member of the side
and in the ensuing fracas Adams stepped in between the two and
was stabbed in the left hand for his efforts to spread calm in an
argument where combustion and emotion had become a volatile mix.
A couple of witnesses were embarrassed by the exchange between
Lara and a teammate that had nothing at all to do with how to
hold a bat and what technique to use against the bouncers to be
delivered by Allan Donald and Shaun Pollock in the Tests.
Now certain truths, suspected yet unproven for weeks, began to
emerge. Lara's captaincy role was neither universal nor accepted
in the team. Those players in South Africa, Adams among them,
were summoned to London along with the team's management.
Personalities and egos were getting in the way of on-field
preparation and players were pulled into argument and decision
making and asked to choose camps.
The claim that the team had gone to London to rally around Lara
and the ``industrial action'' in which a couple of shady characters
(former players agents) were involved was a myth said an
informant. The team was split into more than two camps and it had
nothing to do with inter-island rivalry. If it had, why was it
not sorted out during England's tour of the West Indies a year
ago and subsequent tours? Manager Clive Lloyd and the coach,
Malcolm Marshall, have been firm believers in team unity.
The Adams episode on the aircraft back to South Africa from
London was one of several. Some players did not talk to each
other except when they had to on the field; and Christmas and New
Year were far from festive. Lara admitted there were divisions
after the 5-0 whitewash at Centurion Park.
``When we came to South Africa I was confident of (the West
Indies) doing well,'' he said. ``But the lack of unity in the team,
not being able to fight for the cause together, and coming from
different islands, has made it difficult to establish a team of
unity.''
Was the Lara row with the unnamed player to do with money? Not at
all say informants. It was more to do with pillow talk than anything
else and from that we can draw our own conclusions.
|