Tendulkar's absence seems to have affected the team's planning
Partab Ramchand - 22 July 2001
The difference the absence of just one player can make! If at all any
proof was required that the Indian team would greatly miss Sachin
Tendulkar's omnipotent presence, the first two matches in the Coca-
Cola Cup in Colombo have proved it. The team just does not have the
necessary qualities needed to offset the advantage that Tendulkar's
presence gives it.
Yes, one understands it is not easy for any team to recover from the
absence of a leading player, particularly one of Tendulkar's sublime
capabilities. If anything is evident, it's not just the batting but
even the bowling that has been weakened. But more than the batting,
bowling or fielding, what has really hit the Indian team is the simple
fact that Tendulkar is not around. His mere presence is enough to lift
the team's morale.
Mentally, the team has been hit and perhaps this has turned out to be
the most important factor. But it is true that Tendulkar's absence has
also led to a number of changes which may not augur well for the team.
For starters, it was taken for granted that there had to be a new
opening partner for Sourav Ganguly. But in the first two matches
itself, there have been two separate combinations tried out. Amay
Khurasiya was chosen specifically as a replacement for Tendulkar,
going by the statements made by the selection committee chairman
Chandu Borde. But obviously the team management can't seem to decide
on the opening combination. Why has Yuvraj been pushed to open the
batting when his place is obviously in the middle order? And in the
absence of Tendulkar, should it not be imperative for Ganguly to open
the innings? And yet against Sri Lanka, Ganguly inexplicably dropped
himself down the order. Somehow Tendulkar's absence has weakened not
only the top order but also the entire batting line-up. It has also
led to a change in plans but the team is yet to hit upon a winning
strategy. They seemed to be going in for unnecessary desperate
measures. Witness the needless tactic of sending Harbhajan Singh at No
4 against Sri Lanka. It's a confused team management out there in
Colombo.
The bowling too looks thin in the absence of Tendulkar. His ODI career
figures of 101 wickets at a strike rate of 56.4 with a best of five
for 32 clearly illustrate Tendulkar's value to the side both as one
who can curb the scoring as also his ability as a change bowler used
to break partnerships. And in the event of a leading bowler not
playing - like Ashish Nehra missing out the game against Sri Lanka -
the Indian bowling really looked fragile. Against both New Zealand and
Sri Lanka, they let the opponents off the hook and on pitches that
were helpful to bowlers. The batting, with the uncertainty at the top
and the inexperience in the middle, really cries out for Tendulkar, as
the collapse in both the games clearly illustrates.
The value of the bench strength in any side is vital if it is to
overcome the sudden withdrawal of a prima donna. The Indian team just
does not have the resources required to make good the absence of a
giant like Tendulkar. That is the most obvious lesson driven home by
events in the first two matches in the Colombo competition.
© CricInfo