|
|
Was all lost at Lord’s? - Not so! Dr Nauman Niaz - 21 May 2001
The team has problems. Perhaps the worst that has happened to it is a superfluous presence of living legends. How long they can they remain living as opposed to legends, is a matter of speculation. On the other hand, at Karachi, Wasim Bari, the chairman of selectors will have to get himself a louder alarm clock than the one that failed to wake him while he was selecting the team.
The Pakistan cricketers, replete with a foreign physio, a foreign coach, a foreign bowling coach, a Cambridge trained Manager, training programmes and tonics, arrived in England and right away looked noticeably out of place. If they'd been well prepared for the series as the manager commented, then God knows what yardstick he uses to gauge performance. After having lost at Lord's, Pakistan have a lot of catching up to do. Self-serving though this may sound, coming from me, its interesting to note that Yawar, himself a former Somerset all-rounder, stated that the team didn't require a cricket analyst and that he'll perform the duty himself. So one can ask the fair question, why didn't he firmly instruct the coach to tell his batsmen to not go chasing balls outside off, especially after the follow-on? One can only surmise, by now he must be quite happy for having done the dual job effectively? One must give him credit for supporting his team's cause by ensuring they took the fifth day off and completed the last minute rites minutes before the last session of the fourth day came to an end. Anyway, this happens in cricket. Winning or losing is part of the game but the fact remains, Pakistan's performance was shocking. Perhaps we were expecting rather more than we should have. Pakistanis want their team to win every match and possible thrilled by the previous achievements in England in 1987, 1992 & 1996 we illogically thought that 2001 series will also fetch the same results. And in Waqar, it seemed Pakistan had a captain who would ensure that there would never be a losing moment in a match. Don't we all fail to realize that most of our top cricketers have played out their bit and now merely depend on the great deeds done in the past? Are they just hanging around, just to be there, going through the motions and trying to last a bit longer?
The time has come to accept that Wasim and Waqar will not bowl Pakistan to victory should they be given this assignment in future teams. We must admit that Waqar's bowling too has lost its sustained pace and aggression and now presents few difficulties to the leading batsmen. Nor is Wasim quite the accurate bowler he once was. Two great bowlers these but their glorious days are done and this, sadly, will have to be accepted. Neither Inzamam nor Yousuf are having a good series. Inzamam always carries the burden of team's high expectations but when he fails to get a hundred he tends to be written off as failure. No doubt these two possess undying talent though they have contributed far less than expectations so far. Similarly Saeed has been plagued by his knee injury and is finding age wrapping up his reflexes. He always had the tendency of flirting with balls pitched outside the line of off-stump but we need to accept the truth; his foot movement is now much slower than it used to be. Under English conditions he'll always find himself vulnerable but still there are hundreds of runs that can still surge from his blade, one he wields more attractively than any, provided he applies himself and plays with utmost conviction.
Honest analysis would reveal, Pakistan's performance at Lord's was far below comprehensible standards:
© CricInfo Limited
|
|
|
| |||
| |||
|