FRANCE
Simon Hewitt
How did the team feel about playing in a tournament of such stature?
Thrilled, naturally, especially as this was France's first participation in
the ICC Trophy. It was a terrific reward for players for all the sacrifices
needed to play international cricket at purely amateur level. Three of our
squad, the Brumant brothers Guy and Val, and myself, have been part of the
French national side since its launch in 1989, so the ICC Trophy was a
wonderful climax to our careers.
France won three ECF European Champions' titles in the mid-1990s, and took
part in the ECC European Championships in 1998 and 2000, but the standard of
opposition in Canada was markedly stronger, and higher than we expected.
That may have been the case for other emerging European nations, too:
Germany won just one game like ourselves, while Israel and Gibraltar went
home winless. Uganda surprised many and their bowling was too tight for us,
though we did well to dismiss them for 166. Malaysia were just too good for
us, as we feared.
The event was well-organised and the team enjoyed it immensely. Ball-by-ball
coverage on CricInfo added to the fun and kept many cricket-lovers in France
behind their computer screens deep into the night. With messages of
encouragement e-mailed across daily, the squad felt in close touch with fans
back home. It was probably easier to follow the games on the Net than at the
grounds, where scoreboard operators were non-existent! Our other criticism
would be the continual changes of pitch surface-from grass to slow low
matting, with net practice on bouncy astroturf.
In their debut what were the main lessons learnt by the players?
The striking aspect of successful sides at the ICC Trophy was their ability
to perform to a disciplined game-plan, generally based on bowling a tight
off-stump line, with very few short balls or half-volleys; and the ability
of batsmen to work good bowling through skilful placement and sharp running.
These were certainly areas in which we were outplayed by Argentina, who beat
us by just 6 runs, which suggests that in terms of individual talent we were
probably better.
Our batting technique against spin was poor and too many batsmen hit across
the line. Our seam bowling was inadequate and we were seldom threatening
with the new ball, but our two offspinners bowled marvellously. Our
technical shortcomings are almost inevitable given the absence of serious
coaching, practice facilities and high-quality league cricket in France, and
it may take several years of hard work for an effective difference to be
made at national team level.
We took the chance to study how other countries practised, and were
particularly impressed by the fielding and bowling drills used by Namibia.
Who were the better players and why, and the lessons learnt by the
management about future selection policy?
The 2001 ICC Trophy marks a watershed for the Equipe de France. There are no
major short-term objectives and we can now adopt a long-term approach, with
the next ICC Trophy in four years' time our next significant goal.
France have always been keen to encourage youngsters-Chauny keeper Mathieu
Royant made his debut for the national senior side at 12(!) and that policy
was vindicated in Toronto by the offspin bowling of Sulanga Richmond, aged
17, who took 4-42 against Uganda, and by Arun Ayyavooraju who, at just 15,
looked our most correct batsman against both Malaysia and Namibia. Another
French-born batsman to impress was Gareth Edwards, 22, now showing greater
application to accompany his straight-bat technique.
Offspinner Guy Brumant had superb tournament figures of 10 wickets for 153,
while Shabir Hussain and myself were our only two batsmen to score 50s and
total over 100 runs. Some of our senior players disappointed with bat and
ball, and looked slow in the field. With the exception of Guy and Shabir,
we'll now be looking to build up a side of players in their teens and 20s,
to reach maturity by 2005. Results may take a dip in the short-term. We
accept that.
We'll also be looking to conduct squad affairs exclusively in French from
now on. Up till now the squad has, of necessity, had English-speaking
coaches. Widespread use of English at squad get-togethers has been
inevitable, but it's clear that this was not always helpful to squad unity,
cohesion or efficiency.
We'll also be looking to appoint a strong, long-term back-up team of Coach,
Physio and Scorer. The Physio will monitor players' individual fitness
throughout the year, and the Scorer will use the latest computer software to
provide full statistical analyses of all aspects of performance.
ISRAEL
Herschelle Guttman - coach
Did the revised ICC Trophy format suit Israel?
I thought it was a good idea - it borught teams of the same level against
each other - it was easier for the team knowing they weren't going to lose
by a lot of runs. Each time you knew you had a chance of winning rather than
getting smashed.
Did the side do as well as expected?
No - they should have won three out of the five games - but they didn't lose
as heavily as in the past. They should have beaten France, Argentina & East
Africa, but they didn't.
Was there a consistency about the performances in both positives and
negatives?
Well, first you must realise we weren't able to include a few players in the
side because of restrictions. It was a learning curve, we had hit the bottom
and waiting to go up - we have about seven guys under 25 and waiting to take
their place. We may have lost from a statistical point of view but we have cause for a brighter, more promising future in the next few years. If you want to live in Israel you have to be optimistic.
Where does Israeli cricket go from here?
The MCC are coming out in October and then there's the European Championships next year. We are changing our whole league structure - we are only going to play zonal - [similar to] league, Sheffield Shield then Test side. No more unbalanced games.
© CricInfo Ltd