England travel to Zimbabwe with hope and expectation
Ralph Dellor - 26 September 2001
Harare Sports Club Photo © ECC
|
It might be thought that a trip to Zimbabwe is exactly what the beleaguered
England one-day squad needs to get back to winning ways. They have not
enjoyed a very successful time of late, finding themselves at what they hope
will be the end of an eleven-match losing run. However, when you take
England's record against Zimbabwe into account, they might not be able to
justify any inherent optimism.
The overall record, going back to 1991/2 at a time when Zimbabwe had yet to
attain Test status, is played 16, won 9, lost 7. However, that tally is
boosted by three wins in the NatWest Series in England in the summer of
2000. Outside England, the record tilts six-five in favour of Zimbabwe.
That includes the infamous first meeting in Albury in the 1991/92 World Cup
in Australia when, in one of the great upsets in the limited-overs game,
minnows Zimbabwe managed to overcome the eventual finalists by 9 runs. The
pattern was to be repeated for some time, as in the first six meetings
between the sides going through until 1996/97, England won only won match.
That was at Brisbane in 1994/95 in the Benson and Hedges World Series event.
Even when it comes to margins of victory, Zimbabwe hold the statistical
upper hand. To their credit they have wins by 131 runs in Harare in 1996/97
and by 104 runs in Cape Town three years later. England's biggest margin of
victory is 85 runs on the last occasion the teams met in Harare a couple of
winters ago.
That 1996/97 series marked one of the worst tours England have ever had. Not
only did they lose the one-day series three-nil, but they could only draw
the Test series when neither side could force a win. England might have come
closest to achieving a result, but their hosts were not over-impressed with
the reaction of coach David Lloyd. His "we flippin' murdered 'em" comment
must go down as one of the most insensitive of all time and did nothing to
endear an already discredited touring party to the locals.
So why is it going to be different for England this time around? The fact is
that in recent times they have enjoyed much the better of the exchanges.
Only one defeat at the hands of Zimbabwe in the last eight meetings says
something about the way the balance of power has shifted.
Despite the run of poor form since meeting Zimababwe last time, England will
be expecting to maintain their sequence against the host country. There are
serious problems facing Zimbabwe at home, to the extent that a number of
M.P.s have suggested that the tour should not go ahead. It nearly did not.
It was only lengthy negotiations between the ECB and ZCU that secured
accreditation for all members of the British media party that allowed the
tour to go ahead.
On the field, too, Zimbabwe have had problems. They were thrashed by South
Africa in the first ODI last weekend, and despite the enduring excellence of
Andy Flower's batting and other useful performers in the Zimbabwean line-up,
there is not the same threat as there was. Take out top performers like
Murray Goodwin and Neil Johnson, both of whom have retired from
international cricket, and the lack of depth in the game becomes all too
evident. Having said that, there are few occasions on which any Zimbabwean
team has not given of its all, and the sight of the three lions of England
does seem to enliven them.
England are trying to realign their strategy and team composition when time
to do so before the 2003 World Cup is running out. There are new faces in
the English squad, familiar faces, and recalled faces. What England are
trying to do is find a balance that will allow them to compete with the best
in the world. They singularly failed to do so last summer.
Certainly this team looks sharper in the field than some put out recently.
If the standards can be maintained, if runs can be scored at a decent rate
and if the bowlers can find a line and length that does not allow opposition
batsmen free hits every over, there is no reason why England should not make
definite progress towards achieving their aim.
It says something for the attitude of all concerned that the need for action
was appreciated. It is one thing to bemoan poor performances but quite
another to do something about reversing the situation. It would have been
all too easy to point to a busy winter involving tours to India and New
Zealand and concentrate on an improving Test record. That has not happened,
and even if the likes of Australia, South Africa and Pakistan are way out in
front of England in the race for World Cup honours. England have not given
up yet. The tortoise might yet give the hares a run for their money.
© CricInfo Ltd 2001
|