|
|
|
|
|
|
ICC faces challenge from Asia Wisden CricInfo staff - February 17, 2002
SHARJAH (AFP) The ACC resolved to support India's suggestion that a proposed referees' commission meeting should be put on hold until the issue was discussed at the ICC's executive board meeting in Cape Town in March. ICC, which has already rejected the proposal to put off the February 23 meeting of the commission, may now be left with no option but to seek a vote on the contentious issue in Cape Town. India were unhappy at the composition of the commission, which is to probe the penalties imposed by match referee Mike Denness on six Indian cricketers during a Test in South Africa last year. ICC rejected the names proposed by India, and instead appointed South African judge Albie Sachs, Andrew Hilditch of Australia and Pakistan's Majid Khan to the commission. With the four Asian votes – India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh – pledged in favour of India, the ACC needs just one more vote among the remaining six members of the executive board to jettison any ICC ruling. The executive board comprises the 10 Test-playing nations, and an ACC source told AFP that support for their cause was "guaranteed" from Zimbabwe, South Africa and West Indies. The source suggested: "Only England, Australia and New Zealand may go the other way." Tauqir Zia, the Pakistan Cricket Board chairman who also heads the ACC, told a news conference that "Asia's voice must be heard". In another resolution, the ACC said that any country refusing to tour the Indian subcontinent would be boycotted by all four Test-playing nations of the region. New Zealand, who are undecided about touring Pakistan in April, could be the first non-Asian nation to face the boycott. "What we want from the ICC is that there should be some form of compensation – around a million dollars – to the host country if a team declines to play there," Zia said. "If the ICC does not accept this recommendation, the four Test-playing nations of Asia will automatically refuse either to visit or host that country." Zia hoped there would be no more Test series at a neutral venue, like the recent one in Sharjah, which was forced by West Indies' refusal to play in Pakistan. "The West Indies could easily have played in Pakistan," said Zia, who is a serving general in the Pakistan army. "In fact, even New Zealand should have stuck to their scheduled tour of Pakistan last October. I am saying this because the situation in Pakistan is no different now than it was on September 11." Zia also stressed that he would not support any suggestions to have New Zealand play Pakistan at a neutral venue. "If they refuse to come, the ICC should either give us compensation, or the four Test nations from Asia will boycott New Zealand," he said. "Teams are refusing to tour because they do not get appearance money from the hosts, like in the past. And this is not good for the game." The united stand by Asian cricket nations comes despite the Indian government's repeated refusal to allow their national team to play in Pakistan, because of the political dispute over Kashmir. "That India is not allowed to play against Pakistan is a cause of worry," Zia said. "The matter, however, is out of the Indian Board's hands since it is a government decision and the ACC appreciates the reasons leading to this impasse. We are confident that India and Pakistan will play each other in the near future, and the boards of these two countries are solidly behind each other."
© Wisden CricInfo Ltd |
|
|
| |||
| |||
|