Cricinfo

 

Live Scorecards
Fixtures | Results
3D Animation
The Ashes
ICC World Twenty20
ICC Women's World T20
County Cricket
Current and Future Tours
Match/series archive
News
Photos | Wallpapers
IPL Page 2
Cricinfo Magazine
Records
Statsguru
Players/Officials
Grounds
Women's Cricket
ICC
Rankings/Ratings
Wisden Almanack
Games
Fantasy Cricket
Slogout
Daily Newsletter
Toolbar
Widgets




Wed Dec 19 2001
Issue No: 11

Kumble disappoints on day of high drama

It was a day on which everything other than the much-awaited happened. Local lad Anil Kumble, stuck on 299 Test wickets, could not scalp the solitary wicket that he needed to reach an important milestone. The crowd at the M Chinnaswamy Stadium in Bangalore egged on the leggie as much as they could but went home disappointed. The day, however, was anything but uneventful. On winning the toss, Nasser Hussain elected to bat, and England were going well until Marcus Trescothick (8) was removed by Javagal Srinath. Mark Butcher (27) then needlessly ran himself out with the score on 68. Srinath struck again after lunch, removing Hussain (43). From that point on, Michael Vaughan (64) and Mark Ramprakash (58) put together a doughty 113-run partnership for the fourth wicket. Completely against the grain of play, Vaughan was out handling the ball when he plucked at the cherry just after it rebounded off his pads. Soon after, England lost two quick wickets to Sarandeep Singh (2/45), with Andrew Flintoff (0) continuing a dreadful run with the bat. At the end of the day, though, England will not be too disappointed with 255/6.

Vaughan: Probably it is against the spirit of the game

Michael Vaughan did something at the Chinnaswamy stadium in Bangalore that he will never attempt again in his life. The stylish batsman was on 64 and looking good for a big score when he was given out handling the ball. Vaughan left the ground rather reluctantly, completely bemused about what had happened. Later in the evening, Vaughan talked to the media about his dismissal.

"It was only a natural thing to do. I went for the sweep shot, the ball got lodged between my arm and my pads, and there was no way that ball was going to hit the stumps. I just thought it was the right thing to do to help the short-leg fielder, and I flicked the ball to him," said Vaughan.

"I understand that, in the laws of the game, it is out. I am a bit disappointed that somebody in the team appealed, and obviously the umpire had to give me out," he said. Vaughan clarified his stance further. "It was lodged between my arm and the pad first. The ball was only going one way, and that was forward. I was just a bit bemused by the whole situation and didn't quite know what to do. Obviously, as soon as the umpire puts his finger up, you got to go."

Vaughan insisted that he just wanted to get on with the game, and that he was disappointed that the Indian team had appealed, leaving no option for the umpire but to give him out. When he was persistently asked whether the Indians appealing for the wicket was against the spirit of the game, Vaughan said, "probably it is against the spirit of the game."

A morose Jumbo

Anil Kumble was a disappointed man at the end of the first day's play. Having returned figures of 22-5-59-0, the Karnataka leggie failed to live up to expectations. The crowd of about 10,000 gathered at the M Chinnaswamy stadium cheered every time that Kumble came in to bowl, yet every spell ended in anticlimax. If anyone was more disappointed than Anil, however, it was Radhakrishna and Saroja, better known as Mr and Mrs Kumble - the leg-spinner's parents. Seated in the stands, While Anil's father filmed every ball that his son bowled on a handycam, hoping to capture the magic moment for posterity, his mother was repeatedly captured by television cameras looking anxious, as was famously done in a limited-overs match against Australia years ago. Alas, it was not to be, and they must now return on the second day to try once more!

  • Let our CricInfo correspondent sit on the sidelines of the Bangalore Test for you. Get all the Tour Trivia. Click Here
  • Has physio Andrew Leipus done a good enough job with the Indian team? Should his contract be renewed? Have your say at Third Umpire. Click Here
  • Missed the Motera Test? Live the keenly fought Ahmedabad contest with our Action Replay photo feature. Click Here

At a time when Deep Dasgupta appears shaky behind the stumps, the thoughts of Indian cricket fans will no doubt turn fondly to Nayan Mongia, born on this day in 1969. Still playing for Baroda and eligible for selection, Mongia must be hoping to overcome the selectors' doubts and regain his place in the national side.

With the English not forgetting to pack their fighting spirit at Ahmedabad, Bangalore looks certain to provide yet another evenly matched contest. England will be looking for a series-squaring win, while India will want a 2-0 victory margin. Catch all the action from the exciting final Test of a hard-fought series on CricInfo.com.

Mail The Editor




Michael Vaughan
A tragic dismissal
© CricInfo

Which Englishman has made the highest Test score for his country in India?

Previous Question

Who is the only English batsman to be dismissed for 99 in Tests against India?

Answer:Marcus Trescothick



"Young Richard Dawson got Sachin Tendulkar in the second innings. He is still on a high on getting Sachin's wicket, and that shows our inexperience." Nasser Hussain

"If anybody has made the game boring over the years, it is solely England with their misplaced theories and notions about the game." Sunil Gavaskar, in his newspaper column.



"Ian Robinson is not a just and fair umpire. Too many decisions have gone against the Indians, but when the Indians are batting, he is only too glad to assist the bowling side." Guru


Michael Vaughan becomes the seventh batsman to be dismissed "handling the ball" in Test cricket. The last batsman to be dismissed in this manner was Steve Waugh, also against India, at Chennai earlier this year.

Copyright 2001 CricInfo. All rights reserved. All information displayed on this page (dispatches, photographs, logos), are protected by intellectual property rights owned by CricInfo. As a consequence you may not copy, reproduce, modify, transmit, publish, display or in any way commercially exploit any of the contents of this section without prior written consent of CricInfo.
* Material published in this newsletter does not reflect the views of the ECB